Read as text
श्रीविष्णुपुराण · तृतीय अंश, अध्याय ७, श्लोक १६, "Bracelet, Crown, Earring"
कटकमुकुटकर्णिकादिभेदे कनकमभेदमपीष्यते यथैकम्।
सुरपशुमनुजादिकल्पनाभिर्हरिरखिलाभिरुदीर्यते तथैकः॥ १६ ॥
kaṭakamukuṭakarṇikādibhede kanakam abhedam apīṣyate yathaikam,
surapaśumanujādikalpanābhir harir akhilābhir udīryate tathaikaḥ.
As gold, though undivided, is understood as one thing across the differences of bracelet, crown and earring, so the one Hari is expressed through all the conceptions of gods, animals, men and the rest.
The differences between the objects are entirely real and entirely at the level of form. Nothing is being denied except that the distinctions reach down to what the things are made of.
How the text gets there:
1. Three gold objects differ in function, value and status.
2. The differences are located in shape rather than in substance.
3. The same relation is applied across gods, animals and humans.
4. So the hierarchy among beings is a matter of form, not of what they consist of.
Today: The image handles a distinction people usually collapse. You can hold that differences in role, capability and status are completely real while denying that they go all the way down. Most arguments about equality are confused about which claim is being made.
Which differences you rely on are shape rather than substance? Tell me below.